The 2020 campaign will be more racially divisive than 2016 was
There is method behind Donald Trump’s “go home” tweets
DONALD TRUMP’S bigotry is such an established part of American public discourse that, in retrospect, one of the most febrile debates of 2016 looks naive. Back and forth it went, in the months before the election, as the Republican candidate issued a slur against a Mexican-American judge and for a while refused to disavow the endorsement of a former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard. Was Mr Trump mainly appealing to his supporters’ economic concerns—in spite of his chauvinism? Or was his race-baiting really the main draw?
The answer was in long before the president sent an especially offensive tweet this week, inviting four unnamed, but by inference non-white, Democratic congresswomen to “go back” to where they came from. It was settled before he refused to condemn the white supremacists of Charlottesville two years ago. The data from his 2016 election have been scrutinised, and the resulting analyses, detailed in books and papers, are in agreement. Political scientists find no clear economic rationale for Mr Trump’s victory.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Back to where he came from"
United States July 20th 2019
- America is the only rich country without a law on paid leave for new parents
- Fathers face higher penalties for taking parental leave than mothers do
- Low inflation means the Federal Reserve is changing whom it listens to
- Trump supporters need not apply
- Abortion laws get more attention in the culture wars
- The 2020 campaign will be more racially divisive than 2016 was
More from United States
Bayer wants legislative help to fight its cancer lawsuits
But the maker of Roundup weedkiller faces opposition from Republican and Democratic hardliners
After a season of Gaza protests, America’s university graduates are polarised but resilient
After enduring covid and turmoil over free speech, the class of 2024 finally takes its bow
Can playing cards help catch criminals?
A novel idea for solving cold cases comes with high-stakes risks